Q: During plan review, we submitted a 2x6 wall with unfaced R-21 batts and 1-inch continuous polyiso foam on the exterior. This design exceeds the code’s “20 + 5” insulation requirement for climate zone 6, but it was rejected because it doesn’t “meet vapor retarder requirements.” (Because we are using the foam, we are trying to avoid poly on the interior.) To pass, we were told we needed 2 inches of foam on the exterior. Can you explain why the code’s vapor requirements contradict the insulation requirements?
A: Clayton DeKorne, editor of JLC, responds: The building code is written to be as flexible as possible so you have options. For example, you could install a Class I vapor barrier, such as poly, on the interior and stick with “20 + 5” (R-20 cavity insulation + R-5 continuous insulation). Even though the poly and the foam are both vapor barriers, this wall system does work in cold climates.
But I understand your reluctance to add poly given the trend toward warmer climates and the increased use of air conditioning in cooler climates. I wouldn’t say the requirements contradict each other, but the IRC’s minimum insulation requirements are confusing. At the very least, the insulation requirements listed in Table N1102.1.4 / R402.1.4 (pre-2021 IRC; in 2021, it’s relabeled as Table N1102.1.3 / R402.1.3) should have a footnote that specifies which vapor control option is assumed in the table and refer users to the Chapter 7 options. When using a Class III vapor retarder in climate zone 6, Chapter 7 specifies that the continuous insulation layer needs to be greater or equal to R 11.25 over a 2x6 wall (hence the 2" of foam called for by your local building department).Read More